With nearly every accident report we hear on the radio or television, we are primed for the answer to the automatic question of whether any of the participants were drunk. It says something about the state of our society that we are at once aware of the cost of driving after drinking, yet have not found a good way to prevent it. Still if you are involved in any situation where you are arrested for the offense be sure you have a DUI lawyer in California or you could have a much harsher time than necessary.

The American culture is extremely fond of automobiles and alcohol, and yet the two are a disastrous combination. Our love affair with the car is such that mass transit systems have never really had much of a groundswell of support from any quarter. Through movies and societal behaviors, with a terrific push from some very sophisticated advertising, the use of alcohol has become a ubiquitously accepted social norm, despite the fact that we all know we make poorer decisions after drinking.

There are also times when individuals who are driving with greater than the allowable blood alcohol content and are the victim of careless or even reckless driving by a sober individual. Still, when an officer of the law arrives on scene, the majority focus will fall on the individual who has been drinking, whether or not they were truly causal to the accident. In this case there representation under the law has been subjugated to the near universal condemnation of drunk driving.

It is easy in hindsight to point to an individual that is arrested for drunk driving and conclude they made a bad decision for which they must now be punished. Looked at from an objective viewpoint however, we do not make it easy for an individuals to make the right decision, save the adage that if you have even one drink you should not drive. There is no objective way for a person leaving a restaurant or bar to assess the level of blood alcohol they have, so all they can do is ask themselves if they feel okay to drive.

In addition to the number of times this self determination has been proven an inaccurate methodology, there is also the very real circumstance that each of us react to levels of alcohol in our bloodstream differently. Further complicating this dilemma is the idea that the same person will have different affects on different days. Given these variations plus the notion that the determination is really up to the arresting officer who can make the call even if you are below the so called legal alcohol limit, and you begin to seethe precarious situation the suspected driver is in.

There is no question the public safety mandates that our highway patrol and other law enforcement officials need to do everything they can to eliminate the impact of individuals driving incapacitated. Unfortunately, the results of being cited for DUI are the same whether you just decided to pound a six pack of beer, or have taken medication for the first time and are having a bad time with its impact on your system. Medical conditions can also leave one with the appearance of inebriation.

We have seen this rare mistaken event play out sensationally over the media when a women is subjected to force by an office who believes she is inebriated only to discover she is dangerously hypoglycemic. While the mistake is understandable and can even be justified, the resulting citation will place the unfortunate driver in the position of facing the laws formulated for an entirely different purpose.

Without regard to guilt or innocence, the inflammatory nature of a citation for drunk driving means that such a case will be pursued with vigor under the law. An individual who means well and tries to handle the situation by themselves is likely doing themselves a tremendous disservice. It has been said that he who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer, and that is definitely true in these situations. If you get arrested retain a DUI lawyer in California and give yourself an even chance.

Looking for California Dui Attorney? Get instant DUI legal advice by visiting http://duiprofessor.com/. The DUI Professor’s extensive knowledge within the field of criminal procedure, with an emphasis on unreasonable searches and seizures and due process, provides her with the distinctive skill-set to fiercely defend her clients’ rights.

Tagged with:
 

How A Florida Defense Lawyer Can Be Of Assistance

On October 5, 2010, in Attorney, by Chris Powers

A driving under the influence arrest is a horrifying and challenging situation. You might never have been involved with the legal system. Once you have talked with an attorney and they have outlined the Drunk driving procedure and the means of your defense, you will be assured that your rights are covered, every phase of the path. A Drunk driving conviction can have extended lasting impacts on your life.

Under Florida law, a man or woman is guilty of the violation of Driving Under the Influence if the individual is (1) under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or chemical substances when affected to the extent their normal faculties are impaired OR (2) the person has a breath alcohol content over .08. ‘Chemical substances’ may include illegal substances such as marijuana, prescription medication or cocaine. Evidence of impairment of a person’s general faculties include a sluggish reaction time, speeding, weaving, driving too slow, slurred speech, glassy eyes and difficulty with balance.

Criminal penalties under the laws of the state of Florida for a conviction of Dui are believed to be one of the most harsh in the nation. Resolving the case on your own could easily expose you to penalties including jail, a license suspension, probation, fines, court costs, counseling, substance abuse classes, vehicle impound and more.

Immediately following your arrest, the police officer took your driver’s license and now your driver’s license is suspended. Unless your license was suspended at the point of your arrest, you are authorized to drive for 10 days assuming you keep the actual physical Driving under the influence citation as if it was your license. Within the 10 days, you must make contact with your lawyer to fight your license suspension and acquire you a temporary driving permit. In simple terms, your attorney’s mission is to maintain you driving as long as attainable.

Florida has minimum mandatory sentence guidelines for Driving under the influence charges. Possible penalties include: jail time (depending on the facts), driver’s license suspension, community service, Driving under the influence school, victim impact panel, fines, community service, vehicle impound and installation of an ignition interlock device in your vehicle. In spite of these sanctions being proscribed by law, a Florida criminal lawyer can operate for you to lessen these sanctions, avoid them entirely or get your case lowered to a lesser crime.

If you’re facing Tampa DUI charges, your first step should be to consult with an experienced Tampa DUI attorney. A Tampa DUI attorney can help you understand what actions you need to take to protect your rights.

Tagged with:
 

Injuries Resulting From A Drunk Driving Incident

On October 4, 2010, in Attorney, by Jim Swanson

In the event that you have been struck by a a person that has been driving drunk the first thing you should do is contact the authorities so that emergency help and law enforcement can be sent to the scene. The drunk driver ought to be questioned and detained if over the legal alcohol limit. Countless men and women who have been wounded as a result of the carelessness of a drunk driver are under the wrong impression that this immediately entitles them to money damages for pain and suffering. In fact, the injured person of a drunken driving accident still has to establish the elements of a negligence claim. Those elements include fault, causality, and qualifying harm.

If you are struck a drunk driver it is generally fairly easy to show that the collision was the fault of the drunk driver.

The following element is called proximate cause. Proximate cause suggests that it can be verified that the harm sustained were the specific result of the vehicle accident. If the injury sufferer has had past injuries concerning the same body part proximate cause may be called into question.

The element of a “qualifying injury” pertains to the intensity of the injuries suffered. Although you can demonstrate that a drunk driver’s disregard brought on a personal injury to you, you will need to still meet the “serious injury” threshold which will permit a personal injury action to be initiated.

Significant injuries include but are not limited to death, dismemberment, fracture, or permanent loss of a body organ, member, or system. The definition includes a number of other forms of injuries that will be eligible including one that inhibits a person from accomplishing their usual and routine regular activities for at least 90 of the first 180 days after the crash.

In order to effectively fully grasp the complex legal issues that can develop from personal injuries caused by a drunk driving event, it’s essential to learn about your choices from an experienced local injury attorney.

If you have been injured by a drunk driver in upstate New York, you should contact an experienced local accident lawyer. An Troy accident lawyer can advised you of what actions to take next. Getting assistance from an Troy accident lawyer may be your best chance of obtaining compensation for your injuries.

Tagged with:
 

Los Angeles DUI Lawyer At Your Service

On September 28, 2010, in Attorney, by Junior Jonathan

People love to party, and sometimes they can party too much. If a person decides to become drunk, they need to be in a situation that allows them to sober up either at the party or safely at home. It is the part of getting home that people seem to have trouble with sometimes, and this will be a guide on how you can prevent DUIs. It’ll also assist to make individuals aware that there is a Los Angeles DUI lawyer that can help, as well.

You will find individuals who learn all of this in high school that driving while under the influence is dangerous. They’re warned of drinking in the car is just as bad or even worse. However, people do not listen. The consequences can be horrid, but some individuals seem to get away with it. If they got away with it once, they will do it again. It can hurt the driver, passengers, and other drivers on the road.

Going to a party is really a fun thing. There is no doubt about that. Having some alcohol can make it much better, but it is smart to get a designated driver to the event. That individual lets everybody else drink until they’re tipsy. That is fine simply because then they all get home safely.

People should just be smart enough themselves. They need to know not to drink more than they need. If they have a history of getting drunk then they need to say that they are not going to drink if somebody isn’t there to take them home. It’s simple as that.

Another thing that they can do would be to decide to sleep where they are if they’re too drunk. If somebody throws a party, they must know that there’s the potential of people overdrinking. If it is a home, it is best to let people stay so they can take some of the responsibility as well. Even friends who know that someone normally drinks a lot should know to keep themselves in check if they need to drive a friend home.

These situations could be prevented, yet some individuals select not to prevent the situation. It is not a good thing because terrible things can happen. If they do get in the car, they’re lucky if they get the DUI. It could be a road to awareness where they do not do it again.

DUIs on the record really hurt a driving record. A license can be suspended. It is best to know that one needs a lawyer in this case simply because most drivers aren’t attorneys, and they require someone who can help them present in court. They have committed a felony, and it is proven by a breath test. Lawyers can truly assist in this instance.

Looking for San Bernardino Dui? Get instant DUI legal advice by visiting duiprofessor.com. The DUI Professor’s extensive knowledge in the field of criminal procedure, with an emphasis on unreasonable searches and seizures and due process, provides her with the distinctive skill-set to fiercely defend her clients’ rights.

Tagged with:
 

How To Find The Right DUI Attorney

On September 26, 2010, in Attorney, by Luna Vaz

Facing a drunk driving charge is a very serious thing and can be rather scary in most cases. If you are found guilty of the charge you are able to lose a lot of money and time or even your drivers license as well as see time in jail. Your auto insurance can become very costly and you may even be asked to carry a breathalyzer device with you at all times. So that you can have the greatest chance of getting out of all of this you will have to find and secure a good dui attorney to help you fight back.

The first thing to perform in an instance such as this is to evaluate how much you are able topay to invest on the attorney. A good attorney costs anywhere from $1500 or much more and generally the more they ask for the better they are at this sort of thing. Knowing what type of budget you re working with ahead of time is important here so you don’t waste time on a lawyer you can’t even pay for to start with.

Talk with both friends and family members about any attorneys they have dealt with in the past. These recommendations are a good way of discovering out about great lawyers you might be able to use. Obviously, even if they can’t take your case because they don’t deal with such a thing they most likely know a few attorneys that specialize in this sort of point they are able to refer you to.

Contact your local bar association for info about local lawyers in your region as well. They can not only offer you with a list but also provide you with the info you need to examine out each attorney’s track record as well.

Go on the internet and do a simple lookup for dui lawyers in your area as well. You will find a lot of different websites available that specialize in providing reviews or ratings of attorneys. This can offer you with just the info you need to find the lawyer which will work best for you.

After you’ve compiled your list of possible options you can choose which you like the most and set up initial meetings from there. A lot of firms offer these very first consultations at no charge. This could be utilized as your chance to see how well you get along with each lawyer and ask them any questions you might have. Be sure you give the attorney all the details of your case so they are able to get a good understanding of what you require and decide if they will be able to help you.

After you’ve been through all of your consultations you should then sit down and truly evaluate each lawyer. By now you will probably already know who you would rather work with or at least have a good idea. Each lawyers education, experience and price should also be considered here since this individual will be who you’re trusting to get you out of your dui charge.

After you hire your attorney and have them working away on your case you will soon see that the stress has decreased quite a bit. You also decrease the chance that you are going to be found guilty of the charge as well.

Searching for San Bernardino Dui Attorneys? Get instant DUI legal advice by visiting duiprofessor.com. The DUI Professor’s extensive knowledge in the field of criminal procedure, with an emphasis on unreasonable searches and seizures and due procedure, provides her with the distinctive skill-set to fiercely defend her clients’ rights.

Tagged with:
 

Field sobriety tests supposedly help measure whether a driver of a vehicle is too impaired by alcohol or drugs to properly perform the multitasking required to drive a vehicle. In other words, they are meant to prove that the driver is either driving under the influence or not.

Logic is the study of principles behind correct reasoning. Although logicians do not always agree that the principles behind correct reasoning and the psychology governing correct reasoning are interrelated, they both include a measurement of the principles or basis of ideas governing the validity of arguments. That is to say that the principles of correct reasoning and the psychology of correct reasoning provide a basis for determining whether conclusions can be drawn from given assumptions. The problem lies when the given assumptions are faulty. This can be illustrated through the use of field sobriey tests in drunk driving cases.

Premise: If you are drunk, then you are uncoordinated.

This faulty assumption is the starting point for the unreliability of field sobriety tests. The assumption is that you are uncoordinated, and therefore will fail the tests, if you have been drinking. There are too many variables involved in this assumption for it to be accurate. How about another example? Say the assumption is that if you are good at football, then you are fast. At first glance, this seems right. After all, there are a lot of fast guys in the NFL. But what about kickers or punters? Or offensive linemen? These guys are not fast.

Inverse: If you aren’t coordinated, then you are drunk.

This is the hallmark of the field sobriety tests. The tests assume that failure equals inability to safely drive a vehicle because the test taker is too uncoordinated to drive. Even if you assume that the tests can accurately measure coordination, coordination is not a measurement of impairment. Going back to my second premise, the inverse would be that if you are fast, then you are good at football. Most of us would agree that this isn’t true. I like to think that I was fast, at least during my high school and college days, but I sucked at football.

Converse: If you are not drunk, then you are not uncoordinated.

So what this is telling us is that everyone who is not drunk – the kickball kid, babies, Gus Frerotte, my sister – are all coordinated. Absolutely not. There are plenty of people who have never touched a drink in their lives who are also uncoordinated. The converse of my football example is that if you are not good at football, then you are not fast. Hmmmm. What about Usain Bolt, or Carl Lewis, or Florence Griffith Joyner. They are not good at football. But they are or were world champion sprinters.

Contrapositive: If you are coordinated, then you are not drunk.

It is a myth that all drunk drivers are out there swerving in and out of lanes, hitting orange cones, and generally driving erratically. Plenty of drunk drivers act coordinated. Plenty of drunk people act coordinated. But they are still drunk. So to say that being coordinated means that you are not drunk is erroneous. Just like in the football example, it is erroneous to say the contrapositive (if you are not fast, then you are not good at football) is true. Offensive linemen, kickers, and punters – not fast, but good at football.

In effect, we are applying unreliable tests to determine that people are guilty. So why does all of this matter? Our criminal system is founded upon the principle that it is better to let 99 guilty people free then to convict 1 innocent person. That is why we have the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard. So why do we rely on inherently unreliable tests to judge DUI defendants?

I am not your lawyer. You are not my client. This is not legal advice. It is merely information. Every situation is different and you should contact an attorney licensed in your state to discuss your specific needs. If you need a DUI defense attorney in DC or Virginia, contact a DC DUI lawyer or Virginia DUI attorney without delay.

Issues Facing Those Who Have Entered Into DUI Plea Deals

On September 12, 2010, in Attorney, by Bill Rogers

As a DUI lawyer, I have seen on several occasions the frustration of individuals who have reached me from other general practice attorneys looking to find out why their license suspension is legally a bit longer than they agreed to in court.

One agreeing to a plea arrangement with a certain term of license suspension needs to be on the lookout for three key potential pitfalls:

Did your dui case consist of an allegation that you did not attempt or “refuse” to submit to a chemical test for the presence of drinking?

If your scenario depends on this issue of “refusal,” your dui attorney must specifically tackle within a plea agreement or prior to an argument to a judge that a distinct driver’s license suspension for a “refusal” will “cease” at the time of the sentencing hearing. Absent this written agreement included within a written plea deal between your dui attorney and prosecutor or within a written court order, a separate drivers’s license suspension could be imposed consecutive to the specified term presented by the court.

At the time of your sentencing hearing for a dui conviction does your driving record have either 2 major moving violations or 8 or more minor moving infractions?

Despite a plea agreement to a driver’s license suspension for dui conviction, one’s license can further be suspended by the Bureau of motor vehicles if an individual has accumulated several major moving infractions (Dui, Reckless Driving, Driving While Suspended for a criminal conviction )within a ten year period.

If one has acquired 8-9 minor moving violations in combination with a significant moving violation within a ten year period, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles can suspend one’s license for an additional 5 years. These consecutive license suspensions are called “Habitual Traffic Violator” suspensions and are not always addressed within dui courts.

As a direct result, it is really vital that one confronting a driving under the influence prosecution work with their dui legal professional to realize their driving record and habitual license eligibility prior to entering into a plea arrangement to a driving under the influence crime.

Are you being charged with the offending of Indiana DUI laws? Talk to an experienced Indiana DUI laws attorney today.

Tagged with:
 

Is The Law Protecting The Driver Of Today?

On September 11, 2010, in Attorney, by Adriana Noton

When someone goes and pays the fine that they’ve received because of a minor or otherwise traffic offense they convict themselves of it. Many times people have just taken the word of the prosecution and believe that they are guilty of breaking a law. They assume that their car has been picked up by a camera or some other evidence like a police witness. Well paying up straight away is not always the best course of action.

Nobody wants to get in deeper trouble than they are already and it’s almost intimidation when you are told to pay early or get more points or higher fines. Through the consultation of a paralegal or other legal services provider, you can better decide what you want to do.

The worst thing is that any offense you commit and are convicted for will stay with you for a very long time indeed. For small offenses that could be handled by paralegals, you may not even get a blemish on your name. If you automatically pay something then you are adding a record to yourself.

That is before you get to the astronomical rise in your cost of insurance. The amount that the cost of your policy would rise is incredible even for what are very minor issues. Some people have found the cost of insuring their vehicle after a speeding ticket unmanageable. Just one ticket can do this to someone and you’d be surprised how many people don’t bother fighting them.

Points or demerits are what could also see you get a suspension. You may be OK with your first offense but if you con’t contest it by the time you get your third it’ll be too late. You could have found that the police used poorly maintained radar equipment when they gathered their evidence for a speeding ticket. If the radar was faulty, then you shouldn’t have to pa any fine whatsoever.

That says it all really, you should contest any case that is brought against you so at least you know that they have genuine evidence to convict. To do this properly you should have at least a paralegal look in to what evidence is to be presented against you. They can check the validity of the evidence and advise you what is best to do at that point. Never seek to settle quickly because there are just too much at stake.

If your are ever in a courtroom situation, you can relax knowing full well that you have got someone beside you that knows what they are doing. The court situation may be a strange world for you but these people will have seen everything a thousand times before. For paralegals and other professionals, it’s living and not just a one time or two time mistake.

Today there is a growing number of people that increasingly willing to take on their cases and they are being won all the time. Why should you pay if the police department can’t be bothered to do their job properly. That’s why the law is there to protect everyone and not to help persecute people.

When driving in Napanee, adhere to parking laws to avoid Trenton speeding tickets. When driving always stick to the rules of the road and respect other drivers. Peterborough speeding tickets unfortunately exceeded estimates in 2009.

Tagged with:
 

All About DUI Or DWI In Georgia

On July 24, 2010, in Attorney, by Sam J Meyers

DUI means driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol. It is sometimes also called DWI and OUI (Operating Under the Influence). If you test at a .08% blood alcohol level or above it is used as evidence of Driving Under the Influence and that is illegal in all states.

A DUI sounds pretty open and shut doesn’t it…Driving Under the Influence. Pretty straightforward, right?

Let’s look into this seemingly obvious definition in more depth to demonstrate some possible areas where an astute attorney can attack a DUI charge.

Driving Requirement

The requirement of operating or driving suggests that the driver must have some sort of control or command of the vehicle. Innocence or guilt may hang on whether the defendant was actually “driving” in a given circumstance. What if he or she was just sitting in the driver seat but the motor was off? What if the defendant was catching a few Z’s there? What if the keys were in the defendant’s trouser pocket and not in the ignition? What if that car was out of fuel and could not be started? What if the car was idling and not in gear? What if it was being towed? Courts all around the nation have considered various scenarios to determine whether or not the required control over the vehicle was present and the outcomes vary by state and by the individual context of the situation. Vehicle Requirement Cars, trucks and vans are clearly considered to be vehicles for drunk-driving law purposes. However, people have been convicted of drunk driving while operating motorboats, mopeds, dirt bikes, snowmobiles, electric wheelchairs, golf carts, bicycles and ATVs, although the types of vehicles contemplated differ by state. Intoxication One way prosecutors try toprove driver intoxication is through lab analysis of the amount of alcohol in the defendants body, usually by analyzing the blood or breath. These tests are usually administered by machines, such as the Breathalyzer. In a state, a person with a BAC (blood-alcohol concentration over .08 is considered intoxicated.

Implied-consent laws create the legal presumption that if one takes advantage of the privilege of operating an automobile, she or he automatically consents to state-administered chemical testing to determine his or her blood alcohol concentration. If a driver refuses to take the test, his or her license may be revoked or suspended.

BAC test results over the legal limit are usually presumed to be proof of intoxication. However, defendants may challenge the conclusiveness of the results by showing irregularities in the test administration or problems with the test equipment. For example, your attorney may recommend retesting of the breath samples. One may be able to obtain exclusion of the original breath sample test results from the case or even dismissal of the case.

Other types of evidence that can be used by prosecuting attorneys to show intoxication include drivers’ statements, witness and police observations of behavior of driving patterns and circumstantial evidence. An example of a type of possible relevant circumstantial evidence is that a the accused, before driving, spent the afternoon at a party where drinking games were played.

Police also gather important evidence of inebriation by administering tests at traffic stops. Common field sobriety tests include:

* Finger-to-nose test

* One-legged stand

* Walk-and-turn test

* Horizontal-gaze-nystagmus test

* Picking up coins

* Counting backwards

* Reciting the alphabet

* Throwing and/or catching a ball

Conclusion

Driving is the basis of the American style of living, permeating every activity we do. We dependon driving to get to work, to associate with friends, to run errands and to take a holiday. Licensed drivers drive juveniles, people with physical disabilities and senior citizens to important appointments and activities. A DUI conviction can bring a screaming halt to your life. If you face a conceivable problem with driving under the influence, a lawyer can fight for you and help take care of your interests and those of your beloved relatives.

Also check out these highly relevant links: Walker DWI Legal and Legal Marketing.

Tagged with:
 

You have been charged with DUI. You know that you are facing fines, license suspension, and even potential jail time. Maybe this is your first DUI citation, or maybe it is your fourth. The trust is that many DUI offenders are alcoholics, but they don’t know how to deal with their situation. For the following reasons, it is a good idea to tell your DUI attorney if you know or think you have an alcohol problem.

1) Establish Trust.

Telling your DUI attorney from the outset a fact that is not easy to admit will provide instant trust to your lawyer-client relationship. Your DUI attorney is one of several people that can provide you immediate assistance after you are charged with DUI. You want to get off on the right foot, and you always want to be honest with your attorney. This gives you the best opportunity to create a strategy for your defense and your life.

2) Sentencing Alternatives.

Many jurisdictions offer sentences that don’t include jail time or hefty fines. If one of the goals of the criminal system is rehabilitation, then DUI defendants are prime candidates to target with that goal in mind. Diversion programs, substance abuse classes, driving schools, and other education-based programs are a better alternative to locking someone up, letting them out, and having them drive drunk again.

3) Easier to Help.

Your DUI attorney will have a hard time helping you if he or she doesn’t know what kind of help you need. By admitting that you have a problem, your DUI attorney can then seek help from different sources, and not necessarily the court. A good DUI attorney will have resources available to utilize, and contacts that could help you with both your tendency to drive after drinking and with your alcohol problem as a whole.

4) Your Life May Depend On It.

More than anything, your DUI attorney has the proverbial keys to your life (pun intended). Continually driving under the influence of alcohol not only endangers the lives of other innocent strangers and friends, it also endangers your own life. For that reason alone, if you have a problem, you need to tell your DUI attorney who can provide solutions where needed.

It takes more than a good DUI attorney to help with an alcohol problem. But admitting to your DUI attorney that you are an alcoholic is a good stepping stone in the process of solving that problem. Additionally, you will have laid the foundation for defending your DUI case and, together with your attorney, you can create a strategy moving forward.

DUI laws vary from state to state, and you should consult with an attorney if you receive a DUI citation. If you are in need of help for a DUI in Maryland or DC, contact a Maryland DUI attorney or DC DUI attorney.

Tagged with: